Agency: Bartle Bogle Hegarty
By Russell Davies, campaignlive.co.uk, Thursday, 10 May 2012 08:00AM
My problem is to do with boundaries - first, I'm not sure what a planner is supposed to do any more. Second, I'm not sure what "creativity" you can take for granted these days.
When I started in planning, you could assume that a planner could draw a non-confusing chart, write a non-confusing brief and make a non-confusing mood board for research groups. (The really nice mood board, for the client presentation, would have to be made by the studio - because it had the scalpels and a fume cupboard.)
Then, sometimes, there were special planners with extra skills. They could draw or paint or take decent pictures.
My special skill, for instance, on which I coasted for a number of years, was that I knew - a long time before most people - how to paste an image into a PowerPoint presentation.
These days, I'd assume that almost anyone in an agency or media business knew how to film, edit and title a decent video and get it on to the web. They should know how to set up a good-looking blog, make a reasonable set of wireframes, take a reasonable photo, record and edit a reasonable interview, do a bit of stop-frame animation, nicely visualise some data, know what the golden ratio is and know the difference between Arial and Helvetica, and between a hyphen, an em dash and an en dash. (NB. Before you get all clever, I do not know all these things - I just expect you to.)
I think the average planner should be as comfortable with a marker pen and layout pad as they are with a laptop. The tools of creativity are just far more accessible these days. Doesn't everyone know this stuff? Perhaps not.
But maybe it's about more than general fluency with the tools - it's about the future of the job. And I see a lot more creativity in it, not less.
Personally, for instance, I'm convinced that the most potent and fecund creative unit of the next 20 years is going to be a team of a designer and a strategist. That's who businesses will want solving their problems. Could you do that? Can you talk about affordances and desire paths and say "canonical" a lot?
Though maybe that's all a bit too highfalutin. I also have a bunch of tricks for making the propositions on briefs sound more creative (though not too creative). Maybe I should just show them those. If you're coming on the course, let me know. Everyone else: we'll let you know what we come up with.
This article was first published on campaignlive.co.uk