campaignlive.co.uk, Thursday, 21 February 2013 08:00AM
In last week’s Campaign, Nicholas Coleridge, the president of Condé Nast International, accused the UK’s ABC of being stuck in the 20th century. His main beef was (and is) that the UK "has been much slower than the other advanced media markets to integrate digital replica sales [of magazines] into the headline circulation figure".
The ABC itself obviously refutes such a suggestion. Richard Foan, the group executive director of communication and innovation, says: "ABC in the UK is right at the forefront of the global move to measure and report digital sales of newspapers and magazines, whether websites, replica digital editions or other more flexible digital publication formats."
But is Coleridge right, particularly about the desirability of having one single headline figure? Dominic Williams, the print director at Aegis Media, argues that it’s too simplistic to lump different interactive magazine formats together.
He adds: "I would like to see more fully interactive apps being audited [separately]. If the ABC is to keep up with the demands of agencies and advertisers, it needs to respond with a measurement system [encompassing] all platforms – a combined print and digital editions figure and a separate tablet edition certificate."
Jane Wolfson, the joint head of investment at Initiative, agrees that this is by no means a simple issue. She comments: "One of the advantages of digital is that it can be much more transparent. We want to be able to see how digital circulation figures translate into active downloads, time spent reading and other metrics that give us a clear understanding as to how this element of a magazine circulation is being consumed. All this is possible – but we are not yet provided with this information by the publishers."
And Rob Lynam, the head of press at MEC, tends to agree. He concludes: "The ABC will have to continue to adapt… but I’m not sure [Coleridge’s] proposals would make things any better. Publishers have access to a vast array of data that might give advertisers a much clearer picture of how magazines are being consumed. I’m not sure that the main issue is a combined headline circulation figure."
This article was first published on campaignlive.co.uk
A useful study here from the ‘Pew Research Center’ taking a look at the demographic make-up of US social media users across Twitter, Tumblr, Pinterest, Instagram and Facebook. No data on LinkedIn of Google+, but great stats all the same.