Ofcom takes action as consumers plagued by growing nuisance calls

Consumers receive an average of two nuisance calls per week, with Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) claims companies the biggest offenders, according to Ofcom.

Pic: Jason Heath Lancy
Pic: Jason Heath Lancy

An Ofcom study that asked consumers to keep a record of all unwanted calls on their home landlines over a four week period, and has prompted a renewed Ofcom investigation into nuisance calls.

The watchdog has today (17 May) begun an investigation into suspected abandoned and silent calls made by companies within the claims management sector.

Claudio Pollack, Ofcom’s consumer group director, said: "Two nuisance calls a week is too many and this detailed research will help us understand the root cause of the problem.

"We will use the full range of our powers to tackle abandoned and silent calls, but this is a complex area that requires joint action from a number of different agencies and government."

The investigation comes after Ofcom and the Information Commissioner’s Office sent an open to letter to around 170 organisations across the marketing industry to reinforce the companies’ compliance responsibilities.

Key findings from the Ofcom study:

•           82% of participants received an unwanted call and the average number of unwanted calls received was 8.4 per person over the four-week period.

•           A quarter (26%) reported more than 10 nuisance calls over the four weeks.

•           Calls about PPI claims made up 22% of all nuisance calls, where the panellists were able to identify the product or service, rising to 51% of identifiable unwanted recorded sales calls.

•           Energy (10%), market research (10%) and insurance (8%) were also among the most commonly cited reasons for unwanted calls.

•           The most prevalent types of nuisance calls were live marketing calls (38%), followed by silent calls (34%) and recorded sales calls (14%).

•           Participants were only able to identify the name of the company calling in one in five nuisance calls (20%) and the telephone number in one out of every three nuisance calls (34%).

•           7% of unwanted calls were considered ‘worrying’ while 3% were "distressing" and just 1% were "useful".

Subscribe to Campaign from just £57 per quarter

Includes the weekly magazine and quarterly Campaign IQ, plus unrestricted online access.

SUBSCRIBE

Looking for a new job?

Get the latest creative jobs in advertising, media, marketing and digital delivered directly to your inbox each day.

Create an Alert Now
Brands that forge an emotional tie are best protected from copycats
Shares0
Share

1 Brands that forge an emotional tie are best protected from copycats

Forging an emotional tie with consumers is one of the strongest ways to protect your brand. Products can be copycatted, but the distinctive identity of a true brand can never be replicated argues Nir Wegrzyn, CEO of BrandOpus.

Just published