The great privacy myth

Microsoft may have addressed parents' concerns over safeguarding their children's privacy, in its "Do not track" ad campaign, but the whole concept of privacy is now being turned on its head, writes Nicola Kemp.

Microsoft: "Do not track" ad campaign
Microsoft: "Do not track" ad campaign

Despite the column inches dedicated to misgivings about internet companies invading consumers' personal and virtual space, privacy is almost an outdated concept. In a corporate sense, at least, every communication must be treated as though it will be public. After all, it could easily be published.

David Howard, head of planning at ad agency Fold 7, says an important distinction must be made between businesses and consumers. He believes brands have a duty to value the privacy of their consumers and do their utmost to preserve and protect it, but the same does not apply to their business.

"For businesses and brands, privacy no longer exists," he argues. "Any communication with consumers is open to be shared by consumers, and on social networks they will do so without a second thought. It has become a matter of public interest as to whether a brand has performed well or badly."

Subscribe to Campaign from just £57 per quarter

Includes the weekly magazine and quarterly Campaign IQ, plus unrestricted online access.


Looking for a new job?

Get the latest creative jobs in advertising, media, marketing and digital delivered directly to your inbox each day.

Create an Alert Now

1 Flexible working rules at Dentsu Aegis

Fancy working for a company that cares about your work/life balance and focuses on your performance rather than the time spent at your desk?

The top 10 brands favoured by Remainers and Brexiters

1 The top 10 brands favoured by Remainers and Brexiters

Marketers can learn about our divided nation by examining the brands that appeal across the voting referendum voting split, says Emily James, chief strategy officer at Rainey Kelly Campbell Roalfe/Y&R.

Just published