Coca-Cola Life and Pepsi True's green branding devalues the colour's ethical heritage

The cola wars are back on again with the launches of Coke Life and Pepsi True but their use of green branding leaves a sour taste in the mouth, says Chris Arnold, creative director, Creative Orchestra and author of Ethical Marketing & The New Consumer.

Pepsi True and Coke Life: both brands launched with green branding
Pepsi True and Coke Life: both brands launched with green branding

My first encounter with Coca-Cola's Life product left me confused.

It's packaged in a green container which implies it's some kind of natural, ethical, environmentally-friendly product. What's more, Coke has spent over 100 years associating the brand with the colour red, so this seems a betrayal of the brand to suddenly go green.

Essentially, it’s just a reduced calorie product that uses a more natural source of artificial sweetener, Stevia (instead of aspartame). Hardly a radical overhaul of the product as we are led to believe.

And then along comes Pepsi’s True version in very similar packaging with similar claims. The poor consumer stands to be mightily confused, here we have two big drink companies using green to imply their drinks are what exactly? And as for their names, does Coke give you extra life? And what exactly is ‘true’ about the Pepsi’s product?

At first you may think they are pushing some kind of new-found ethical ethos, but what both are trying to do is make their soda look like a natural and healthy product, which is pure spin.

Less unhealthy

Coke Life may be less fattening than traditional Coke (27 calories instead of 42 calories per 100ml) but it’s a lot more fattening than Diet or Zero. Using a more natural sweetener doesn’t make it a healthier product, just less unhealthy. And how safe is Stevia in the public’s mind considering it was banned in the US in the 90s?

So why have they both invested massively in this calorie compromise?

In the US, unlike the UK, they are more suspicious of zero sugar or fat products, believing them to have too many chemicals substitutes

In the US, unlike the UK, they are more suspicious of zero sugar or fat products, believing them to have too many chemicals substitutes, so Americans prefer mid calorie versions of foods and drinks. And it is this market they are both hoping to tap into and revitalise a decline in soda sales.

With two brands, that aren’t exactly seen as ethical brands, their use of green just devalues the use of the colour green and it’s association with natural and environmental products. Coke claims the green is inspired by the green leaf of the Stevia plant. Seriously?

Will these brands succeed or fail like Pepsi Next and Coke’s reformulated version?

The problem of sending confusing messages to consumers is they tend to avoid brands rather than try to decode them.  I bet both will get a packaging revamp within the year and I suspect that neither product will achieve the sales in the UK both brands are desperately hoping for, especially as the consumer has far more real healthy options like coconut water and green tea based drinks to choose from.

Subscribe to Campaign from just £57 per quarter

Includes weekly and quarterly print issues, plus unrestricted online access.

SUBSCRIBE

Looking for a new job?

Get the latest creative jobs in advertising, media, marketing and digital delivered directly to your inbox each day.

Create an Alert Now
Look out for the invisibles and introverts in your agency
Shares0
Share

1 Look out for the invisibles and introverts in your agency

By cultivating a clubbable culture, agencies are ostracising talented introverts, writes Andy Jex, the executive creative director at Saatchi & Saatchi London.

Just published