ASA takes RSPCA to task over validity of photo in AMV work
By HARRIET GREEN, campaignlive.co.uk, Friday, 06 November 1998 12:00AM
The RSPCA has had its knuckles rapped by the Advertising Standards Authority over an anti-hunting press campaign created by Abbott Mead Vickers BBDO.
The RSPCA has had its knuckles rapped by the Advertising Standards
Authority over an anti-hunting press campaign created by Abbott Mead
The ads, which ran in November 1997, led to four out of nine complaints
being upheld against them in this November’s ASA report.
The RSPCA was criticised for using a photo of a disembowelled fox which
it could not prove was genuine.
The ASA also ruled that the charity had been misleading in suggesting
that hounds killed stags, when most stags are killed by other means,
such as firearms. The RSPCA was asked not to repeat the claims in future
However, the ASA ruled in favour of the RSPCA on a number of other
points, including claims that some stags are pregnant when hunted.
The findings came in response to 20 complaints from members of the
public, including one from the pro-hunting organisation, the Countryside
This article was first published on campaignlive.co.uk
- Mid Weight Planner - ATL Daniel Marks London £30-£50K + Excellent Benefits, Central London
- Vertical Strategic Account Manager Yahoo! Competitive, Greater London
- Country Commercial Director Yahoo! Competitive, Greater London
- Senior Director, Strategic Accounts Yahoo! Competitive, Greater London
- Digital Designer Creative Recruitment £30000 - £40000 per annum, City of London
- OgilvyOne loses BA business
- Campaign Viral Chart: Pepsi tops Coke with Jeff Gordon test drive
- Iris and Cheil big winners at MAA Best Awards
- Twitter attracts more ads, but rates tumble 67%
- Greenpeace protests outside Saatchi & Saatchi London office
- Facebook research finds 42% switch device mid-activity