EDITORIAL: Jaw-jaw only way out of war-war in Equity strike
By SARAH DU HEAUME, managing director of J, campaignlive.co.uk, Friday, 12 December 1997 12:00AM
The Equity dispute has spiralled out of control. What began as a well-intentioned attempt to save money on the ever more ridiculous cost of making TV commercials has evolved into a full-scale strike by Equity members, threatening several high-profile advertising campaigns.
The Equity dispute has spiralled out of control. What began as a
well-intentioned attempt to save money on the ever more ridiculous cost
of making TV commercials has evolved into a full-scale strike by Equity
members, threatening several high-profile advertising campaigns.
Many neutrals might agree that the cost of voiceovers, including repeat
fees, is too high, but most would also understand why the suggestion of
a 60 per cent reduction at one go is wholly unacceptable. It would be
hypocritical of Campaign not to support attempts to reduce the base
costs of commercials production, but this does appear a heavy-handed way
of approaching the issue.
As the effects of Equity’s predictable intransigence have begun to bite,
cracks have emerged in the industry’s united stance. First, the other
members of the Joint Equity Negotiating Group expel the Advertising Film
and Videotape Producers Association for breaking ranks, being more
conciliatory, and urging ACAS arbitration. Then several production
companies mutter darkly about setting up a rival to the AFVPA. Now,
there appears to be mounting disquiet among some ad agencies about the
way the affair has been handled.
As ever, most of the criticism is in private, which makes it difficult
to endorse publicly. The gist of it is that some agency heads, looking
on in alarm as top stars begin pulling out of ads, are starting to
question the credentials of the people conducting negotiations at the
Institute of Practitioners in Advertising and the Incorporated Society
of British Advertisers. What do they know about life at the coal-face,
say the critics.
To resolve this dispute to everyone’s satisfaction, ad agency bosses
will have to get involved. The alternative is an escalation into ever
more intractable positions. It is essential that someone be prepared to
compromise in order to get back round the table before the situation
gets worse. How about dropping any preconditions?
This article was first published on campaignlive.co.uk
- Mid Weight Planner - ATL Daniel Marks London £30-£50K + Excellent Benefits, Central London
- SENIOR ACCOUNT MANAGER - Events & Experiential Live Recruitment £40000 - £50000 per annum + Benefits, West Midlands
- SEO Account Director - up to £50K plus benefits Salt £45000 - £52000 per annum + £20K OTE, London
- Senior Account Director - Advertising Spectrum 360 Recruitment £60k - £65k, London, Soho
- Middleweight Designer become £36K, Central London
- Campaign Viral Chart: Pepsi tops Coke with Jeff Gordon test drive
- Iris and Cheil big winners at MAA Best Awards
- Twitter attracts more ads, but rates tumble 67%
- Greenpeace protests outside Saatchi & Saatchi London office
- Kevin Bacon, Google Glass and Julian Assange: the SXSW weekend in tweets
- Halifax releases 'holiday dad' campaign