NEWS: Publishers split over ABC auditing revamp

By ANNE-MARIE CRAWFORD, campaignlive.co.uk, Friday, 15 December 1995 12:00AM

A row is looming among top publishing houses over the Audit Bureau of Circulations’ plans to change its auditing procedures for consumer magazines next year.

A row is looming among top publishing houses over the Audit Bureau of

Circulations’ plans to change its auditing procedures for consumer

magazines next year.



At a meeting last week, the ABC council set up a task force of consumer

magazine representatives charged with agreeing the changes.



However, the decision looks likely to split the industry. While IPC

Magazines feels strongly that an overhaul of the existing system should

go ahead, Emap and Conde Nast are understood to be against any change.



The proposed changes involve harmonising auditing methods for all

consumer magazines and highlighting when titles have deviated more than

20 per cent from their average circulation.



Currently, there are two methods for auditing the two categories of

consumer magazines - general and specialist. The different procedures

have grown out of the different nature of the titles. The plan is to try

to thrash out a system to merge methodology for the two sections.



Nicholas Coleridge, managing director of Conde Nast, said: ‘I’m

sceptical whether it’s a good idea to keep adding layers of rules. It’s

the old civil service disease. I, and most publishers, have better

things to do than keep funding ever-increasing bureaucracies.’



Tom Moloney, chief executive of Emap Magazines, said: ‘It’s important

that the ABC responds to the needs of the market. However, over the past

two or three years, there have been a lot of changes to ABC methodology,

such as the inclusion of bulk sales, and I don’t think the industry has

fully understood them. Before we make any more, we need to assess how

the changes so far affect the industry.’



This article was first published on campaignlive.co.uk

X

You must log in to use Clip & Save

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Additional Information

Campaign Jobs