2012 Olympics advertising pitch in sponsorship furore

By Staff, campaignlive.co.uk, Monday, 30 March 2009 11:00AM

LONDON - The pitch for the 2012 Olympics advertising account has been plunged into controversy after it emerged that the winning agency would be expected to sign up as a sponsor of the games, at a cost of almost £10 million.

Olympics...Agencies withdraw from 2012 pitch

Olympics...Agencies withdraw from 2012 pitch

Two agency groups have already said they will withdraw from the pitch unless the sponsorship stipulation is removed, according to reports over the weekend.

The payment is expected to be "in kind", including particularly time, rather than an upfront fee.

But some agencies are adamant that the price is crippling, and unlikely to be justified by the exposure that the agency would receive from being named as an official sponsor.

Agencies have also suggested that the approach is unlikely to ensure the games receive the best possible marketing support.

Other Olympics sponsors that have made "value in kind" deals include the chewing-gum brand Trident, the technology group Airwave, Boston Consulting Group and the solicitor Freshfields.

The advertising pitch is scheduled for mid-April.



This article was first published on campaignlive.co.uk


You must log in to use Clip & Save

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Additional Information

Campaign Jobs