ASA to force estate agents to clean up act over 'hidden' fees

The Advertising Standards Authority is making a stand against estate agents and property websites with a ruling that will force full disclosure of previously hidden fees.

Property: ASA forces estate agents to clean up
Property: ASA forces estate agents to clean up

Estate agencies will no longer be able to omit details about compulsory fees from advertising after a test case against estate agent Your-move.co.uk, which ran an ad on property website Rightmove.co.uk.

The offending ad drew a complaint after not including details of an administration fee in the quoted price, a practice that will no longer be allowed after the ASA ruled the practice violated advertising rules.

Guy Parker, chief executive of the ASA, said: "Hidden fees are not only unfair, they hit those who are struggling hardest. 

"Our ruling today makes clear that letting agents need to get their houses in order and treat potential tenants fairly." 

The ASA claims the ruling will protect those new to the rental market and unused to some of the practices used by estate agents to hide fees.

In the future, if compulsory fees can not be calculated in advance, the agent must make it clear in the ad that these fees have been excluded and provide additional information to help people "establish how fees are calculated".

In a further warning shot, Parker says the ASA has made it a "priority" to make sure estate agents "bring their advertising into line".

Your-move.co.uk initially attempted to defend the ad that sparked the ire of the ASA by claiming the ad was "in line" with market practice and added that no agent listing properties on Rightmove disclosed admin fees within the listings themselves.

It also claimed the administration fee was information that did not need to be known when people were arranging viewings on Rightmove.co.uk and added details of admin charges were covered on its website and from the Your-move.co.uk branch on request.

However, the ASA opted to take action and ban the ad after ruling that arranging a viewing in itself was a transactional decision and likely to be affected by the cost of an administration fee.

As a result, the ASA stated the ad breached the CAP Code because it did not clearly indicate the administration fee was not included in the quoted price.

Subscribe to Campaign from just £57 per quarter

Includes the weekly magazine and quarterly Campaign IQ, plus unrestricted online access.

SUBSCRIBE

Looking for a new job?

Get the latest creative jobs in advertising, media, marketing and digital delivered directly to your inbox each day.

Create an Alert Now
Share

1 Why your iPhone is killing your creativity

Every day, the insatiable parasite that is your smartphone makes you worse at your job, writes a group creative director at Ogilvy.

Case study: How 'This girl can' got 1.6 million women exercising
Shares0
Share

1 Case study: How 'This girl can' got 1.6 million women exercising

"This girl can" was based on a powerful insight: that the fear of judgement by others is the primary barrier holding women back from participating in sport.

Just published

More