Facebook is a lower quality medium than TV, says marketing academic

Advertiser should pay less to reach people on Facebook than on TV because the former skews mainly towards a brand's heaviest buyers, according to Professor Byron Sharp from the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute of South Australia.

Facebook: a lower quality advertising medium says Professor Byron Sharp
Facebook: a lower quality advertising medium says Professor Byron Sharp

Speaking at an event held by TV marketing body Thinkbox on Friday (23 March), Sharp said to grow, brands needed to reach people who didn't buy their category very often. However, Facebook fans "skew massively to the heaviest buyers, the people who are the easiest to reach".

Sharp said: "They see you more often, they notice everything you're doing. You should pay less to reach those people. TV reaches your normal category buying base, but earned media skews to your heaviest buyers. It therefore, is a lower quality media."

The Ehrenberg-Bass Institute is part of the School of Marketing at the University of South Australia and has one of the largest numbers of marketing scientists in the world. Its corporate sponsors include Coca-Cola, Unilever and Procter & Gamble.

Sharp said earned media such as Facebook was "very sexy at the moment" but it skewed towards heavy buyers of a product, while marketing tactics that skewed towards light buyers were of "great strategic value".

He said TV had a higher value than earned media because it reached a brand's normal category base, while higher rating TV shows were even more valuable because they had a higher proportion of people who were light TV viewers.

Presenting as part of an event for around 200 people from the media, marketing and advertising industry at Bafta in central London on Friday morning (23 March) Sharp said growth came from people who did not buy the category very often.

He said: "Big brands reach the people who don't buy the category very often – that's what big brands have managed to do. That what big brands are. A brand that's really small skews towards the category buyers."

To demonstrate how big brands were built by the people who bought them infrequently, Sharp used the example of Coca-Cola.

In 2005, British Coke buyers bought an average of 12 cans of Coke each, but Sharp said that figure was skewed by the people who drank Coke "morning, noon and night".

In fact, less than 5% of buyers bought 11 to 13 cans during 2005, and a typical Coke buyer (around half) only bought one or two cans over the entire year.

Sharp said: "Who is [the] typical buyer? If you're Coke it's them. That's half your customer base. And that's a big brand. All big brands have a skewed distribution like this, with the vast bulk of their customers down that end.

"It reminds us why Coke advertises. Because what do Coke ads say? They say 'Enjoy Coke'. They've said the same thing for decades. They spend an enormous amount of money telling us the same thing.

"Who is Coke advertising to? It's the millions of people down that end that buy a Coke once or twice a year. These are the people Coke needs to jump in front us and say: 'Hey, you know us – why don't you buy us?'"

Follow Maisie McCabe on Twitter @MaisieMcCabe

Subscribe to Campaign from just £57 per quarter

Includes the weekly magazine and quarterly Campaign IQ, plus unrestricted online access.


Looking for a new job?

Get the latest creative jobs in advertising, media, marketing and digital delivered directly to your inbox each day.

Create an Alert Now

1 Meet the new breed of ad agency chiefs

A new wave of first-time CEOs are opting to do things differently in an evolving landscape. They discuss the business model of the future with Jeremy Lee.

Case study: How 'This girl can' got 1.6 million women exercising

1 Case study: How 'This girl can' got 1.6 million women exercising

"This girl can" was based on a powerful insight: that the fear of judgement by others is the primary barrier holding women back from participating in sport.

Just published