MEDIA: FORUM; Has the new Rajar system dented radio integrity?

How damaging will the latest controversy over the Rajar figures be? Will agencies attempt to use the new figures to screw rates down to the floor? And will advertiser confidence in the medium be dented? Just what steps can the radio industry take to try to restore confidence in it? Alasdair Reid reports

How damaging will the latest controversy over the Rajar figures be? Will

agencies attempt to use the new figures to screw rates down to the

floor? And will advertiser confidence in the medium be dented? Just what

steps can the radio industry take to try to restore confidence in it?

Alasdair Reid reports



In media research, the nightmare scenario is that you tweak a few things

here and there to make the figures more accurate and vast chunks of

audience suddenly disappear off the system. Ask anyone in the radio

industry - the worst has just happened there. In monthly figures

released last week, the first to come from the rejigged Rajar system,

listening appears to have dropped dramatically across the board

(Campaign, 8 December).



The system was modified because of the continuing proliferation of new

stations. The theory is that listening habits have been changing: people

are listening to more stations than before but are spending less time

with each one. But the research wasn’t really reflecting this adequately

- there were so many stations listed on the self-completion diary that

they had to be printed in a microscopic typeface that no-one could read.

A new diary format was devised to help reflect new listening patterns

and be fairer on stations whose listeners dipped in and out.



Not all observers believe that change was necessary - not at this stage,

at any rate. They believe that changes were forced through by under-

performing stations - and that those same stations still have a vested

interest in destabilising the system. They’ve already had a fair bit of

success in that direction and things could get worse if the BBC decides

that Rajar’s integrity has been damaged so badly that it has no option

but to pull out.



But just how bad is that damage? Has the credibility of the medium as a

whole been dented? Has the entire trading system been destabilised? Will

agencies and advertisers be alarmed at the new numbers? And what can

Rajar and the radio industry do to re-establish credibility?



Bill Kinlay, the media director of O&M Media, says that radio is playing

a dangerous game. ‘Rajar is by no means perfect, but it is better

thanits predecessor, Jicrar - it has a bigger sample size and has been

producing very robust figures. To discredit the whole thing is bad for

the industry,’ he argues.



Kinlay believes that the Rajar system is being attacked by a handful of

stations that have been disgruntled about the poor figures the system

has been giving them - but he warns that, in the end, this will produce

no winners. ‘No-one gains from a discredited system,’ he says. ‘It’s

wrong for Rajar to be changed to suit a few people who are unhappy. If a

group of stations comes out badly, they just have to take it. It’s

tough, but they can’t start trying to change the system in the hope that

it will start producing figures that will please them.



‘The real problem is greed. There was always bickering in the past, but

the industry managed to pull together and it began to reap the rewards.

But now that there’s more money around, the bickering may be coming to

the fore again. That’s the real problem the medium has to address.’



Corinne Purton, the head of campaign planning at one of the country’s

biggest users of radio, the Central Office of Information, certainly

isn’t prepared to panic. ‘Some people just love to make a drama even

when there isn’t a crisis,’ she says. She points out that the same

scaremongers were out in force when a change in the Barb television

audience research methodology produced similar discontinuities - and

they will probably re-emerge to rubbish the poster industry’s updated

Oscar research next year.



‘This is a storm in a teacup based on one month’s data,’ she adds.

‘Almost certainly any reported fluctuations in reach will be due to

changes in the very light listener group. I recognise that audience

research is essential for buyers and sellers, but what I’m interested in

as an advertiser is effectiveness. According to our own research, radio

is an extremely effective advertising medium if executed correctly. So

this current controversy is unlikely to turn the COI and its clients

away from radio - but we wouldn’t worry if it did because from our point

of view it would help to contain the medium’s demand-led inflation.’



Nigel Reeve, the sales director of Classic FM, agrees that panic is

totally unnecessary - but he does think that the new system should be

ditched. ‘Providing Rajar gets its act together quickly, there won’t be

any serious damage done,’ he states. ‘The new methodology has caused

falls right across the board - it’s not as if commercial listening has

suddenly fallen behind the BBC. So I don’t believe this will have much

effect on revenue.



‘It is true that the promiscuity of radio listening is increasing.

Unfortunately, the new methodology doesn’t capture listeners who tune

into a station for less than one hour - so it’s effectively a step

backwards. It will take some serious talking involving both sides of the

industry - the BBC and the commercial side - but I believe that we have

to go back to the old system until a workable new system is devised. The

sooner that happens the better.’



But David Fletcher, the head of radio at CIA Medianetwork, takes a more

sanguine view. ‘Until a few years ago, people thought of radio as an

immature and unprofessional medium,’ he points out. ‘Then it got its act

together and everyone got excited. This latest business is the ultimate

sign of that maturity - people always start fighting again.



‘The stations themselves are bound to take it all seriously - the thing

about media research is that its figures correlate directly to revenue.

And yes, agencies will be using this in negotiations. Some stations will

lose revenue and there will be short-term uncertainty. Round the

fringes, a few new radio advertisers might be put off.



‘But it isn’t as if there weren’t massive fluctuations on the old Rajar

figures. Other media have been through this sort of thing and have

survived. The worst thing that can happen is that everyone loses their

nerve and the whole research specification starts to unravel. I can’t

see that happening. In fact, I’ll bet that no-one will remember a thing

about all of this in a year’s time.’



Perspective, p20



Become a member of Campaign from just £45 a quarter

Get the very latest news and insight from Campaign with unrestricted access to campaignlive.co.uk ,plus get exclusive discounts to Campaign events

Become a member

Looking for a new job?

Get the latest creative jobs in advertising, media, marketing and digital delivered directly to your inbox each day.

Create an Alert Now

Partner content

Share

1 Why creative people have lost their way

What better way to kick off Campaign's relaunch than with another think piece on the current failings of our industry, written by an embittered, pretentious creative who misses "the way things used to be"...

Share

1 Job description: Digital marketing executive

Digital marketing executives oversee the online marketing strategy for their organisation. They plan and execute digital (including email) marketing campaigns and design, maintain and supply content for the organisation's website(s).