'Misleading' auction websites rapped for unfair and confusing practices

The Advertising Standards Authority has warned pay-per-bid auction websites about unfair practices that are confusing customers and leaving them out of pocket.

Swoggi: one of six online auction websites ruled to be misleading customers
Swoggi: one of six online auction websites ruled to be misleading customers

The watchdog today published a series of ruling banning the "misleading" advertising claims by six pay-per-bid auction websites.

Following today’s ruling, the ASA said it expects the companies involved to get their websites in order and have provided them with guidance. 

Pay-per-bid auction sites such as MadBid and Swoggi, more commonly known as penny auctions, are a type of timed online auction where customers pay each time they bid on an item, usually through pre-bought credits. The investigation also ruled against BidBid.co.uk, Liklebid.com, Fastbidding.co.uk and BidwizEU.com.

The ASA took action after receiving complaints that these sites have been exaggerating savings on items and incorrectly quoting recommended retail prices. 

Macandi, the company behind MadBid and sister website Megabargain24.com, was singled out as misleading because they did not make clear how the auction process worked, including the fact that customers could only win an auction a limited number of times in a month.

The ASA also found some savings and RRP claims couldn’t be proved, the commercial intent of their ads was not clear, and the expiry times for offers were misleading. 

Meanwhile Sophora Media, which owns Swoggi.co.uk and MoneyExpert360.com, could not show that "instead of" or "worth up to" claims for auction items were the prices at which the products were generally sold, the ASA found. Implied endorsements by newspapers such as the Daily Mirror and The Times were also found to be misleading.

Miles Lockwood, director of complaints and investigations at the ASA, said: "It’s unfair that consumers have been led to believe they’re getting a big discount or bargain when it turns out savings claims were exaggerated and associated costs and terms and conditions haven’t been clear.

"Our rulings and guidance put pay-per-bid auction business on notice; they need to get their websites in order so that consumers get a fair deal." 

Topics

Subscribe to Campaign from just £57 per quarter

Includes the weekly magazine and quarterly Campaign IQ, plus unrestricted online access.

SUBSCRIBE

Looking for a new job?

Get the latest creative jobs in advertising, media, marketing and digital delivered directly to your inbox each day.

Create an Alert Now
Share

1 Meet the new breed of ad agency chiefs

A new wave of first-time CEOs are opting to do things differently in an evolving landscape. They discuss the business model of the future with Jeremy Lee.

Case study: How 'This girl can' got 1.6 million women exercising
Shares0
Share

1 Case study: How 'This girl can' got 1.6 million women exercising

"This girl can" was based on a powerful insight: that the fear of judgement by others is the primary barrier holding women back from participating in sport.

Just published

More