Nestlé's Pollack: Brands should pay a premium for quality not safety

Brands should acknowledge that with digital media, like any other media, quality inventory comes at a cost, Nestlé's head of media communications for UK and Ireland, Steve Pollack told Media360.

From left: Nasse, Pollack, Ryder and Spanier
From left: Nasse, Pollack, Ryder and Spanier

"Buying a 3am spot on TV may be cheaper, but what audience would you be reaching? Digital should have the same realisations. There’s a good reason you’re paying for quality to reach the right eyeballs," he added.

Pollack was speaking in a panel at Media360 on transparency, viewability and accountability in the changing media landscape. The panel was moderated by Campaign’s head of media, Gideon Spanier, and Pollack was joined by Suzy Ryder, managing partner – digital & technology, OMD UK; and Paul Nasse, UK commercial director, Integral Ad Science.

Brands need to separate paying for quality and paying for transparency and safety – they two very different things, agreed Nasse. "I wouldn’t expect to be paying for brand safety, but we need to get to a point where the industry breaks out the differences of cost and what exactly you’re paying for. 

The big worry for brands and publishers is the money that goes missing between what the brand pays and the media owner gets  - a continual theme throughout the conference 

"I worry about this a lot," Pollack says. "Every pound we spend has to have a purpose and the purpose is to build our brands. We’ve all seen the stats and I saw a chart in a breakout room by Iotec that charted the known tech fees…and the unknown bit in the middle. The challenge is that unknown bit."

While there are things a brand can do to address the mysterious tech tax, he continued, there is a chance that no brand can single-handedly eliminate this fee.

"Talking directly to publishers helps. This is something we’ve always done since I joined Nestlé. Not to speak against agencies but, as a client, if you just rely on your agencies, you’re doing yourself a disservice," concluded Pollack who later added that Nestlé worked with "a few – less than 20" publishers.

It’s a challenge for agencies to protect their clients in this fragmented digital landscape, Ryder said speaking of brand safety and viewability. "There are inconsistencies and different levels of thoroughness across media owners."

What matters, she continued, is not to press a button and just walk away. "Anyone can implement technology – effectiveness doesn’t depend on just using the tech, it’s about the data. If you’re not studying it and using it to better what you’re doing  to minimise risk, the whole process is pointless."

Subscribe to Campaign from just £57 per quarter

Includes the weekly magazine and quarterly Campaign IQ, plus unrestricted online access.

SUBSCRIBE

Looking for a new job?

Get the latest creative jobs in advertising, media, marketing and digital delivered directly to your inbox each day.

Create an Alert Now
Share

1 Why your iPhone is killing your creativity

Every day, the insatiable parasite that is your smartphone makes you worse at your job, writes a group creative director at Ogilvy.

Case study: How 'This girl can' got 1.6 million women exercising
Shares0
Share

1 Case study: How 'This girl can' got 1.6 million women exercising

"This girl can" was based on a powerful insight: that the fear of judgement by others is the primary barrier holding women back from participating in sport.

Just published

More