Sports Direct can't lay claim to words 'direct' or 'fitness', court case finds

Sports Direct has lost a trademark infringement case against online retailer Fitness Direct, whose name it claimed was "detrimental to the distinctiveness" of its brand.

Sports Direct: loses trademark infringement case
Sports Direct: loses trademark infringement case

The sportswear giant said Fitness Direct’s name would lead to it having an "unfair advantage" that could damage its own chain of gyms, The Telegraph reports.

The retailer, majority owned by Mike Ashley, launched SportsDirectFitness in 2014 – the same year that husband and wife team Faycal and Sandra Makhloufi launched Fitness Direct.

But the trademark hearing dismissed the company's argument, saying that the words used were not unique and the logos of the two brands were clearly distinct.

Subscribe to Campaign from just £57 per quarter

Includes the weekly magazine and quarterly Campaign IQ, plus unrestricted online access.

SUBSCRIBE

Looking for a new job?

Get the latest creative jobs in advertising, media, marketing and digital delivered directly to your inbox each day.

Create an Alert Now
Case study: How 'This girl can' got 1.6 million women exercising
Shares0
Share

1 Case study: How 'This girl can' got 1.6 million women exercising

"This girl can" was based on a powerful insight: that the fear of judgement by others is the primary barrier holding women back from participating in sport.

Just published

More