Wikipedia puts Daily Mail on unreliable sources list

Editors of Wikipedia have voted to ban the Daily Mail as a reliable source for the online encyclopaedia.

Wikipedia puts Daily Mail on unreliable sources list

According to the summary of a discussion proposed on 7 February by an editor with the moniker Hillbillyholiday, the final consensus among the editors was that the Daily Mail, including its online version, MailOnline is "generally unreliable, and its use as a reference is to be generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist."

The site plans to place an edit filter that will warn editors attempting to use the Daily Mail as a reference.

Reasons for the ban centred on "the Daily Mail’s reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication".

According to The Guardian, the editors have also asked for volunteers to review about 12,000 links to the Daily Mail already on Wikipedia and replace them with alternative sources wherever possible.

The Daily Mail and The Wikimedia Foundation were contacted for this article but have not yet responded.

Topics

Subscribe to Campaign from just £57 per quarter

Includes the weekly magazine and quarterly Campaign IQ, plus unrestricted online access.

SUBSCRIBE

Looking for a new job?

Get the latest creative jobs in advertising, media, marketing and digital delivered directly to your inbox each day.

Create an Alert Now
Why Cosabella replaced its agency with AI and will never go back to humans
Shares0
Share

1 Why Cosabella replaced its agency with AI and will never go back to humans

In October, lingerie retailer Cosabella replaced its digital agency with an AI platform named "Albert". Since then it has more than tripled its ROI and increased its customer base by 30%.

Just published

More