Cosmetic surgery ad slammed by regulator

 

LONDON - The Advertising Standards Authority has banned a radio ad for the cosmetic surgery group MyBreast after a rival challenged its claim to be "leaders in cosmetic surgery here in the UK".

Top 10 surreal ads

Top 10 surreal ads

Campaign's pick of the most surreal TV ads

Best of Droga5

Best of Droga5

View some of the agency's best work, following accolades at the D&AD Awards

Digital Britain

Digital Britain

What's in the report?

Tony Davidson and Kim Papworth

Tony Davidson and Kim Papworth

The best work from the W&K creative team

Creative poses

Creative poses

Top London creatives strike a pose for D&AD New Blood

Top 10 Mother Orange Gold Spots

Top 10 Mother Orange Gold Spots

Campaign's pick of Mother's Orange Gold Spots

My Aesthetics, the founders of Mybreast.org.uk, said the ad, created by Meerkat Marketing, intended to demonstrate the experience and qualification of its surgeons, who were leaders in the field.

It provided information on the professional standing and activities of its founders. It also gave details on its implant supplier and its warranty.

MyBreast said its level of consistency, aftercare and quality made it "leaders" in the cosmetic surgery sector.

The Radio Advertising Clearance Centre believed listeners would infer the claim to mean the company was at the forefront of the industry in terms of development of procedures, quality of care and service and support. It did not feel the ad was likely to mislead.

However, the ASA backed the complaint by rival company Transform. It said listeners would understand the claim "leaders in cosmetic surgery" to be comparative, implying that MyBreast offered a greater range or number of procedures than its competitors.

On this point it found it likely to mislead and ruled that it must not be broadcast again in its current form.

X

You must log in to use Clip & Save

 
 

All Comments

Fred Perkins

Fred Perkins - 18 November 2009

Save us all... ASA is rapidly getting to a stage where ANY comparative statement or superlative adjective is disallowed in any advertisement.

Can't we give the public credit for having even a tiny amount of common sense, and able to recognise that advertising superlatives are always to be taken with a pinch of salt???

Maybe ASA will only be happy when advertising is reduced to "Hi. We're here. Buy us"

Oh, but maybe even that is disallowed, cos someone could argue that they didn't know us, so we can't say "we're here...".

 

Chris Worsley - 18 November 2009

the ASA seems to be aping the FA at times. I find it almost impossible to second guess which way they will rule in any given case - reasonable concerns are overruled and fairly dumb complaints are upheld.

Some consistency please?

 

Your Comment

 
 
 

To post comments please log in here.

 
 
Search More Jobs

Email Bulletins

You can sign up here for our email bulletins. Enter your email address, select the bulletins you are interested in and click Subscribe.

Preview
Preview
Preview
 

Christmas ads 2009

Christmas ads 2009

View this year's crop of festive ads

ADdicts cartoons

ADdicts cartoons

Gallery of cartoons published each week in Campaign

Public View

Public View

What does the public think of the latest ads?

Viral View

Viral View

Best of the latest ad virals

Promotion - Integration Essays

Promotion - Integration Essays

Watch videos of Integration Essays 2009 contributors

Campaign Awards Fight

Campaign Awards Fight

Pit two industry creatives against each other

House of Cards

House of Cards

Gallery of images from Leo Burnett's Shelter exhibition

 

In Print

Cover Latest issue: 5 February 2010Subscribe
 

Poll

Will 2009 go down as the year media sold itself short?