Ad for manhunt.net escapes ban
By John Reynolds, campaignlive.co.uk, Wednesday, 13 June 2012 11:17AM
An outdoor ad for online dating service manhunt.net that features two topless men about to kiss has escaped censure by the advertising watchdog, despite a flurry of complaints that it was overtly sexual.
The ads were created in-house and ran in February. The advertising watchdog was hit with 20 complaints that argued the ad was offensive and overtly sexual.
There were also 14 complaints that challenged whether the ad was inappropriate for general display.
In response, Online Buddies, manhunt.net's operator, said the ad was first displayed next to the oldest gay bar in London and was displayed at a second location several metres away from London's largest gay club.
Online Buddies said it took into account the proximity of gay clubs, where they believed the ads were most likely to be seen by their target audience and that it ensured the ad was not within viewing distance of schools or business that provided children-based services.
Online Buddies argued that the image was not overtly sexual.
Primesight, the outdoor media owner which displayed the ad, said the ad first appeared in a location that carried a placement restriction for alcohol ads.
Once Primesight became aware that the ASA (Advertising Standards Authority) had received complaints, it moved the ad to another location, which was also not within viewing distance of schools.
It also sought advice and was advised the image was sexualised and likely to be investigated.
The same ad was running globally and Primesight thought the ad was not inappropriate and were therefore happy to run the campaign.
In its ruling, the ASA said it had noted that Online Buddies and Primesight had given the poster's location careful consideration, so as to avoid schools and businesses that provided children-based services.
The ASA ruled the ad was "sexually suggestive", rather than overtly sexual, and therefore required a placement restriction to prevent it from being displayed within 100 metres of schools.
As such a restriction had been put in place, the ASA concluded the ad was not socially irresponsible and the ad could continue to run.
Follow John Reynolds on Twitter @johnreynolds10
This article was first published on campaignlive.co.uk
- Affiliates Executive - No. 1 Agency! GoodEgg Digital Circa £25k + Exceptional Benefits, Central London
- Digital Display Manager - Leading Agency GoodEgg Digital £Neg + Great Benefits, South East England / London (Central), London (Greater)
- Senior Marketing Director - 9-12 month FTC Comedy Central £competitive, Camden, London (Greater)
- Dutch Speaking Marketing Manager Ninesharp £35000 per annum, West London
- Comms Account Manager - BEAUTY FMCG Ultimate Asset £32000 - £38000 per annum, London
- Channel 4 to drop 4oD for digital service All 4
- FT to reveal first design overhaul in seven years
- David Hasselhoff to join Sorrell, Naughton and Shing at IAB Engage 2014
- Sky boosts Sky AdSmart's targeting capabilities for advertisers
- 5 key trends from Dmexco 2014
- Philips launches campaign for app-controlled lightbulbs