Does Stuff's move herald a new era for men's mags?
Is Stuff's decision to remove women models from its front covers significant for the industry, Arif Durrani asks.
News that Stuff, the UK’s biggest-selling gadget magazine, will no longer use images of scantily clad women to help sell copies sparked a debate last week.
Since its launch in 1996, women in various states of undress have been a staple for the tech title. The new look is said to be the culmination of research and cover trials for three editions.
Will Findlater, the editor-in-chief of Stuff, admits the move was not made lightly. He has worked at the title for ten years and reveals the team has been testing covers without models since 2010.
"Personally, I’ve never been particularly comfortable with it [use of female models]," he says. "I don’t think it represents the content of the magazine and have always found it quite disingenuous."
Back when Stuff first hit the newsstands, it was a golden age for the so-called "lads’ mags". In the late 90s, these publications were flying off the shelves, with FHM and Loaded selling more than 770,000 and 450,000 copies a month respectively.
Stuff hoped to benefit from being displayed next to these titles as opposed to being in the more staid special-interest sections in the shops.
But those days are long gone. The likes of Maxim and Nuts have since closed, and the magazines that remain are, in sales terms, shadows of their former selves.
Stuff, meanwhile, is evolving from a monthly print magazine into a multiplatform brand. Circulations of around 77,000 copies may be down from the highs of 100,000 in 2006, but are still up from its first ten years.
Print subscribers continue to be heavily skewed towards men (about 94 per cent) but, online, there is a far more even split (40 per cent female) as technology becomes more mainstream. But Stuff’s move away from female models on its covers is still a big moment.
Kerin O’Connor, the chief executive of The Week, made a name for himself during his time as the international director of Maxim. He understands Stuff’s decision but warns the move is "not without risk". He says one thing research studies consistently show is that respondents say they want things that, in practice, they don’t actually like.
So, is the decision an industry milestone?
This article was first published on campaignlive.co.uk
- Campaign Marketing Manager EMAP Competitive + Bonus, London (Greater) / London (East), London (Greater)
- Exhibition Designers WRG Live Competitive salary and benefits package dependant upon experience, Manchester, Greater Manchester
- Producer WRG Live Competitve salary and benefits package dependent upon experience, London (Central), London (Greater) / Manchester, Greater Manchester
- Content Manager WRG Live Competitive salary and benefits package, Manchester, Greater Manchester
- Marketing Manager (Mobile and Social) Creative Recruitment £40000 - £50000 per annum, London
- Martin Sorrell earns 780 times more than average WPP employee
- 3 top tips on how to save an epic social media fail
- Lake Capital rejects demands of Engine's rebel shareholders
- Head lice-killing mousse launches in the UK with cartoon campaign
- Facebook's 'Buy' button: a leap too far?
- Beiersdorf postpones review after MAA criticisms of procedure