Think BR: Good data protection law should not throttle innovation
By Nick Stringer, brandrepublic.com, Thursday, 13 December 2012 08:30AM
The European Commission's data protection proposals have the potential to set Europe's digital agenda back by years, writes Nick Stringer, director of regulatory affairs, IAB.
As we begin to trawl through the many ‘five digital marketing things to look out for in 2013’ articles over the next few weeks, there is one thing that we should all prioritise in 2013: making sure that the European Commission’s data protection reforms do not set the sector back 10 years.
In January 2012 the European Commission proposed changes to the way personal data is protected and regulated across EU markets.
Its motives were driven by a need to update existing law (eg UK Data Protection Act 1998) in light of technological change, a need to streamline the law across markets to make it easier and more efficient to conduct business, and - most important of all - afford European citizens with a strong level of data protection and accountability.
There appear to be very few who disagree with these motives: the development of the internet and the importance of data now means that we now conduct our lives very differently, from how we’re more productive at work, how we communicate, read, buy and share things and how we access and use public services.
The collection, use and exchange of data has led to new business models, new innovations and new benefits for citizens. And the internet is global, connecting us up in a way unheard of a few years ago.
But - as the draft proposals get debated in Brussels - it appears that these motives have been forgotten, overshadowed by detailed discussions about a set of prescriptive proposals that may thwart evolving innovation, prevent ‘start ups’ from competing, wrap consumers up in a ‘click hell’ and stall the UK digital economy by making the data environment so restrictive to advertising and ecommerce models. I’m not sure that this is what the drafters really wanted. They are using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
The UK Government understands the need for a proportionate and balanced approach - one that provides strong data protection but does not throttle innovation.
It recently published an impact assessment which showed that the draft proposals will actually cost businesses, in stark contrast to the European Commission’s own claims that it will save businesses money.
But the UK is only one voice amongst 27 across Europe. Failing to get these new proposals right will set Europe’s digital agenda back by years. Business will just go elsewhere and we - as consumers - will be worse off as a result.
Nick Stringer, director of regulatory affairs, IAB
This article was first published on brandrepublic.com
- European Marketing Co-ordinator Blue Skies Marketing Recruitment £20000 - £23000 per annum, Rugby
- Global Head of Trading-South Africa Lipton Fleming £90000 per annum + benefits, Johannesburg
- MW ARt Director Red Sofa London £30000 - £35000 per annum, London
- SEO Executive - Award Winning Digital Marketing Agency ADLIB competitive, Oxford
- Junior Marketing FMCG Jarlett de Grouchy £23000 - £28000 per annum + benefits, City of London
- Anti-slavery charity creates '12 Years a Slave' tactical ad after Oscar win
- Cobra introduces bra-making brewer 'The Boss'
- Majority of 15m Twitter users in the UK follow a newspaper
- Hooch appoints More and MJ Media for Keith Lemon campaign
- Birds Eye kicks off £60m pan-Euro campaign
- Will content kill traditional ad models?