Russell Davies: Microsoft shows its mettle by believing in consumer privacy
By Russell Davies, campaignlive.co.uk, Thursday, 21 June 2012 08:00AM
Do you have a chief privacy officer? You don't? Fair enough. Microsoft does, though. I've just been reading his blog because Microsoft recently made all sorts of interesting ripples in the world of advertising and privacy and it suddenly pricked my interest in the company again. I bet I'm not the only one.
Microsoft made these ripples by announcing that the next version of its browser - Internet Explorer 10 - would have Do Not Track enabled by default. This means that, unless the user changed it, all sorts of online advertising services wouldn't be able to drop a cookie on that user's computer and therefore wouldn't be able to measure that person's behaviour or target them with advertising.
In some ways, this isn't a big deal - it's a single setting that can be easily changed by the user and is probably not top of the list of things you would care about when you think about installing a browser. And, frankly, this is a long way from being a reality, as Do Not Track isn't an established protocol and Explorer 10 is still in beta.
But, of course, in other ways, this is a huge and interesting deal. Not a few commentators have pointed out that Microsoft's big rival, Google, makes most of its money from online advertising (though Microsoft does pretty well out of it as well), and this move was widely assumed to be a tactical dig at the company.
Maybe it was, maybe not. What's perhaps more interesting is that Microsoft appears to think that a reputation for being respecters of privacy is a useful corporate resource right now. It is not alone in having a chief privacy officer, or in having a suite of privacy policies and protocols, but - as it has shown with Explorer 10 - it is not afraid to put its privacy principles into action and spend some money doing it (short-term money, at least).
There are a couple of interesting things to notice about this. First, privacy matters. At least, one large corporation that invests in lots of consumer research seems to believe that privacy is an issue that will steer consumer choices. Personally, I think they're right.
Second, Microsoft is still a smart and savvy competitor. Certainly, it is not the dominant business it once was, but it is a long way from resembling the likes of HP or Yahoo!. It has got good, smart products in mobile and gaming - categories that matter these days - and, crucially, there's a whole generation of young technologists who don't really remember Microsoft as a big bully and are quite excited to go and work for someone with its resources and reach.
It just goes to show - sometimes you just need to keep going. And maybe you should get a chief privacy officer.
This article was first published on campaignlive.co.uk
- Senior copywriter story uk limited Negotiable depending on experience, Edinburgh
- Senior Marketing Manager Cutis Developments £50,000 - £60,000 per annum , Victoria, London (Greater)
- Print & Digital Designer Michael Page Digital £35000 - £40000 per annum, City of London
- Client Director Daniel Marks London $130-180K salary (depending on experience), New York (City) (US)
- Global Strategy Director - New York Daniel Marks London $150-200K salary (depending on experience), New York (City) (US)
- Daily Mirror publishes its own tits on Page 3
- 'This girl can' tops Campaign Viral Chart
- John Brown Media appoints Rebekah Billingsley to head of digital and content strategy role
- 'You don't have to explain yourself if you are getting the job done,' says Tracy De Groose on work and motherhood
- Publicis Groupe extends deadline for Sapient deal again
- Lidstone exits Havas amid restructure