AMV dominates in D&AD Awards

Abbott Mead Vickers BBDO dominated the nominations at this year’s D&AD Awards, with frequent mentions for its Dulux and Guinness campaigns, especially for the ’surfer’ spot.

Abbott Mead Vickers BBDO dominated the nominations at this year’s

D&AD Awards, with frequent mentions for its Dulux and Guinness

campaigns, especially for the ’surfer’ spot.



Saatchi & Saatchi also appeared more than once for the Army, WCRS for

Land-Rover and Speedo, and Wieden & Kennedy for Nike.



However, it has been another thin year for press advertising at the

awards with only one nomination made this year for copywriting and none

at all for press advertising or art direction.



D&AD’s director, David Kester, said the standard of press advertising

this year as ’poor’, but added that it was ’not as stark’ as in 1996,

when no copywriting entries made it into the nominations.



’It’s difficult to say why the quality of press advertising is so low,’

he said. ’Three different juries - art direction, copywriting and press

- all had the same problem.’



The sole nomination this year for copywriting went to AMV for its

anti-smoking campaigns for the Health Education Authority. Posters put

up a stronger showing than press, with six nominations made in the

poster category, half of them for AMV’s Guinness work.



There was an absence of the dotcom advertising that had propelled US

agencies to the top of last year’s winners’ list. ’It was a very good

year for the British and also for mainstream brands,’ Kester said.



D&AD’s revamped interactive design category boasted 334 entrants this

year, which were whittled down to nine nominations. These included

websites for the Design Museum, a Cartoon Network game called Townsville

Terror and Sony Mavica’s online advertising.



Kester said it was too early to say whether press advertising’s poor

showing would spark any extra initiatives.



In 1996 a series of educational initiatives were launched to try to

raise standards.



Creative Issue, p28.



Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus