Campaign Diary: I’m only a punter but

What gives with media magazines, like this one, and their fixation with running moody portrait photographs of suited feckers?

What gives with media magazines, like this one, and their fixation

with running moody portrait photographs of suited feckers?



I understand and appreciate how a boring column about the new reams of

FMCG research or the dotcom revolution can make your life shorter by

33.33 minutes. But do we really need to be subjected to a photo of

someone who we will probably never see or hear of again?



The only sensible answer has to be to apply the same rule that governs

local media the world over. The more people you photograph, the more

loyal these people/readers become.



Fair enough if it only went that far. Unfortunately, the knock-on effect

of this particular ego trip is that even very humble media people know

they will be photographed eventually. Then they can start demanding that

some exorbitant photographer be hired to make them the very embodiment

of what we are meant to think is someone who is ’sharp’.



Please, no more. Instead I would suggest everyone has to use his or her

tube pass photo. I don’t want to know about people who don’t have a

London tube pass. Tell me the last photograph Campaign ran of anyone

working for a non-London company.



But that’s a different rant for a different lunchtime.



Topics

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus