COMMENT: Why I’m repulsed at P&G’s tie-in with Benetton’s ’cause’

Regular readers of Campaign will know that this magazine is not a fan of Benetton’s advertising - if, indeed, you can call it advertising.

Regular readers of Campaign will know that this magazine is not a

fan of Benetton’s advertising - if, indeed, you can call it


Mind you, I’m not even sure that Benetton itself would call it that.

My guess is that the best term to describe what Benetton does is ’social

art’. Certainly, it has long maintained that these campaigns have

nothing to do with selling jumpers, but are all about forcing the public

to confront the great issues of our time - racism, civil war, Aids and

so on. The fact that Benetton just happens to use the world’s oldest

advertising medium for its ’social art’, which appears when new ranges

hit the shops, must be a coincidence.

What then are we to make of the latest Benetton ads which feature Down’s

syndrome children? For those of us who have become inured to Benetton

over the years, there’s nothing particularly different about these ads:

the same shock tactics, and the same self-justifying moral

high-mindedness (’challenging assumptions of beauty’), although, this

time, for a first, the ’models’ are actually wearing clothes.

By and large, however, I’ve always tolerated the Benetton campaigns.

In my heart, I never believed that they weren’t about selling more

product, but I gave them the benefit of the doubt. This time, it’s

different and for one reason - the four little words ’in association

with Lenor’ and the tiny teardrop-shaped Lenor logo.

Yes, readers, you’ve got it. The mighty Procter & Gamble has jumped into

bed with Benetton or, as the mealy-mouthed P&G press release puts it,

’Lenor Care has been endorsed by Benetton.’ Money has changed hands

although, as Benetton says, it’s a question of extra money from P&G for

extra poster sites.

As you’ve probably guessed by now, I find myself utterly repelled by

this association. But why this particular Benetton ad? Well, that’s the

difficult bit. On one level, it’s the total inappropriateness of the

juxtaposition of the clothes with Lenor. A serious issue is treated with

all the depth of a fashion item. It’s as if Benetton is saying, ’Dress

your Down’s syndrome child in our clothes and you can pretend everything

is normal’ and then, to make matters worse, P&G chips in by saying, ’And

they appreciate it even more if you use Lenor.’ Could anything be more

tacky? Only, say, if Benetton had let Durex or Mates endorse its Aids


But, ultimately, the thing that really disgusts me is the way the ads

represent a corruption of Benetton’s so-called morality. After all, if

this Benetton campaign is about raising the issue of disabled children,

why disfigure it with a nakedly commercial purpose?

The ad is adorned with Benetton’s usual catchphrase, ’United Colours of

Benetton’. In this case, the phrase, ’True Colours of Benetton’ might

have been more appropriate.

Become a member of Campaign

Get the very latest news and insight from Campaign with unrestricted access to, plus get exclusive discounts to Campaign events.

Become a member

What is Campaign AI?

Our new premium service offering bespoke monitoring reports for your company.

Find out more

Looking for a new job?

Get the latest creative jobs in advertising, media, marketing and digital delivered directly to your inbox each day.

Create an alert now

Partner content