MEDIA: FORUM; Is the ITC right to criticise ITV or is it out of touch?

ITV and Channel 4 both had a ‘could do better’ report card from the Independent Television Commission last week. ITV was given a stern talking to for its love affair with police series. Does it really need to pull its socks up or is the ITC starting to exhibit an extremely tenuous grasp on reality? Alasdair Reid reports

ITV and Channel 4 both had a ‘could do better’ report card from the

Independent Television Commission last week. ITV was given a stern

talking to for its love affair with police series. Does it really need

to pull its socks up or is the ITC starting to exhibit an extremely

tenuous grasp on reality? Alasdair Reid reports

There’s something quaintly old-fashioned about the Independent

Television Commission - at least there is in its role as arbiter of good

taste and wholesome family values. It seems to have survived

unreconstructed from the days when Listen with Mother could still be

found on the Home Service and the very idea of an independent television

network was a dangerous innovation.

Last week, Channel 4 and ITV were to be found in the ITC top corridor

(Campaign, 26 April), about to enter the head’s study to get a caning

for various breaches of discipline - Channel 4 for not producing enough

home-grown material and running too many repeats and ITV for being

obsessed with police series, for letting things slip in its regional

output and for showing too much general entertainment to the detriment

of religious and arts programming.

ITV’s indictment over wall-to-wall police programming is probably the

most bizarre of these charges. Some of the shows, especially Camera

Action Live and Police, Camera, Action!, which use video material shot

by the police, were deemed to be in very bad taste indeed. They probably

are. The point is, though, that millions of viewers disagree. Some of

the most successful programmes in the history of television have been

cop shows. After all, 13 million people tune into the Bill each Friday -

surely 13 million people can’t be wrong?

Last year, ITV took a lot of stick from advertisers for failing to

deliver audiences. Surely the last thing it needs now is to be penalised

for turning things around. And, surely, the last thing that advertisers

need is for ITV to pay too much attention to what the ITC thinks?

Leslie Hill, the chairman of the ITV Association, defends ITV’s regional

record - regional news outperforms the BBC’s rival service - and says

that there is nothing inherently wrong with crime series. After all,

hasn’t Cracker just won a best drama Bafta for the second year running?

But he believes in the importance of balance: ‘As the ITC recognises,

ITV must strike a balance between its obligations to its viewers, its

advertisers, its regulators, its shareholders and to the Treasury.

Such a balance has to involve sustaining successful programmes while

experimenting with new formats and ideas to keep the schedules


He continues: ‘As the UK’s most popular channel, ITV has to strike a

balance between satisfying and forming viewers’ tastes across a wide

range of programmes. There is evidence to suggest that a schedule which

is strong on entertainment is extremely popular with viewers.’

Hill is nothing if not diplomatic. Yet it must be frustrating to have to

face the toughest competition in the network’s history with one arm

effectively tied behind your back. Even though the ITC recognises the

realities of competition - it has overseen concentration of power on the

sales side, for instance, and approves of further mergers and

acquisitions within the network - the ITC certainly seems in no mood to

cut ITV some slack. Should it be? Is it time for agencies and

advertisers to remind the ITC about the realities of the marketplace?

Paul Taylor, the joint media director of BMP DDB, agrees that it’s just

not possible to keep both the advertising community and the regulators

happy. ‘It’s true that the regulators live in a rarified world where

television is deemed to be there solely to educate and inform,’ he says.

‘The biggest audiences go for lowest common denominator mass

entertainment. The regulators probably don’t really understand that ITV

companies have paid huge sums for their franchises and need to make

money by delivering mass audiences.

‘Of course, there’s a need for television to lead as well as follow

tastes - and Channel 4 certainly seems to want to stay ahead of the

fashion. ITV would make a pretty strong defence of its record in this

respect, too. Experiment does form part of the schedule and there are

highbrow elements there - it’s just that they are kept half-buried and

well away from higher value commercial slots.

‘Having said all that, I still think that the ITC is a useful foil

against unrestrained commercial pressures. It would be quite easy for

ITV to appeal just to the shell-suit audience but we want a balanced

offering. We want to be able to reach Times readers on ITV, too.’

Barry Spencer, the media communications manager of Kraft Jacobs Suchard,

is also surprisingly supportive of the ITC, though he admits that

advertisers don’t always know as much about the programme production and

scheduling side of the business as they pretend they do. ‘Generally, we

are only interested in how programmes perform in delivering audiences.

Broadcasters such as ITV have to come up with the sort of audiences that

advertisers want and find the formats that produce the numbers,’ he

points out.

‘As it takes a balanced schedule to do that, that isn’t very different

from the ITC’s view of the remit. In the recent past, ITV has

highlighted the drama side, but it can’t just ignore whole areas of the

audience. So I’m delighted that the ITC is putting pressure on. It’s not

necessarily negative.’

Chris Locke, the deputy managing director of the Media Centre, says that

ITV has been doing pretty well and should be encouraged to keep going.

‘The ITC doesn’t really have much basis for criticism as far as I’m

concerned,’ he states. ‘What I would like the ITC to do is to push ITV

into keeping up the effort for 12 months a year. In the summer, the

network thinks it’s OK to tread water for a while. There is a real

opportunity to increase ratings there, though.

‘But there has been an uplift in quality recently. The ITC may think

police shows are tacky. I think it makes itself look a bit ridiculous

when it comes out with that sort of thing. What does it mean by tacky? A

lot of the programmes it presumably likes are worse. Anything with

Philip Schofield in is tacky. Band of Gold is very tacky. Compare that

with A Touch of Frost or Cracker. And, anyway, what’s wrong with tacky?

Blind Date may be tacky, but it’s quality tack.’


Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus