Has the new Route research been overhyped?

Will Route's massive GPS audience-tracking initiative really change advertiser spend, Alasdair Reid asks.

The outdoor industry almost ran out of superlatives last week as it basked in the afterglow of the launch of Route, its new audience research product.

This was bigger, better, faster, shinier. The project involved 28,000 people carrying GPS meters for nine days as they went about their business. A location point was logged every second, creating 19 billion data points. These were mapped against 360,000 ad sites across a range of outdoor formats, each of which had been assigned a "likelihood to see" factor.

Route is one of the most impressive pieces of media research ever undertaken – and its significance, arguably, goes beyond the outdoor advertising medium. There are those who believe this is one of the most important pieces of anthropological research ever undertaken in this country, delivering an unprecedented state-of-the-nation picture of life (and, in particular, travel patterns) in the UK.

It’s a powerful testament to the nature of our relationship with the built environment; and, even at an impressionistic level, it shows the extent to which outdoor advertising is woven into the very fabric of our everyday lives.

But will it be the "game-changer" for outdoor that some of its most ardent fans would have us believe? People have been pointing out that it offers more data than Barb or Rajar or the National Readership Survey or the ABC – as if this means that outdoor somehow now trumps these rival media.

The stat about the 19 billion data points was repeated endlessly – as if this alone was a killer fact. But, actually, the truth is surely that we’re reaching a point in some business sectors where people are realising that, when it comes to data, bigger doesn’t automatically mean better.

Academics in the number-crunching world, for instance, are becoming impatient with would-be commercial suitors – telling them that, if big data isn’t "contextualised", then it can add up to little more than a pointless exercise.

So… all those numbers may be nice, but will they actually help persuade advertisers to shift more of their spend into the medium? Which, after all, is surely more than half the point here. Or has Route been oversold?


NO Denise Turner, head of intelligence, Havas Media

"It has been difficult to pick up the effects of the out-of-home medium in econometric models. And it hasn’t been properly integrated into surveys such as IPA TouchPoints, so it has been difficult to plan in comparison with other media."

YES Nick Maddison, head of business development, the7stars

"Data helps advertisers understand the effect of their marketing investment – and Route certainly seems to have lots of it. But we’re unsure whether the data will allow us to make outdoor more efficient and thus effective."

NO Chris Marjoram, managing director, Rapport

"Route will influence the way that we plan out-of-home and the way that it is sold. It offers us the opportunity to buy targeted audience campaigns, which, in time, could redefine our currency for the way out-of-home is [traded]."

MAYBE Nick Bailey, managing partner, M2M

"Route is a step forward – and it will help [the medium] argue for a greater share of budget. But the way outdoor is traded is still a bit archaic, so the reality may be a little different. I’m sceptical about whether this is a silver bullet."

You have

[DAYS_LEFT] Days left

of your free trial

Subscribe now


Our new premium service offering bespoke monitoring reports for your company .

find out more

Become a member of Campaign

Get the latest news and insight from Campaign with unrestricted access to campaignlive.co.uk , plus get exclusive discounts to Campaign events

Become a member

Looking for a new job?

Get the latest creative jobs in advertising, media, marketing and digital delivered directly to your inbox each day.

Create an Alert Now

Campaign AI

Our new premium service offering bespoke monitoring reports for your company

Find Out More