NEWS: Industry upset by absentee judges and lack of awards

Initial controversy at this year’s D&AD ceremony centred on the absence of any awards in either the photography or copy categories, and the failure to include any examples of copy in the 1996 D&AD annual.

Initial controversy at this year’s D&AD ceremony centred on the absence

of any awards in either the photography or copy categories, and the

failure to include any examples of copy in the 1996 D&AD annual.



The celebrity turn-out also provided a talking point. When Graham Fink,

the president of D&AD, announced the list of invited judges earlier this

year it contained famous names from the arts, including the novelists,

Martin Amis and Will Self; the artists, Damien Hirst and Gilbert and

George; and the comedians, Bob Mortimer and Vic Reeves (Campaign, 10

November 1995).



The judging was beset with rumours about members of the ‘luvvie’

contingent not showing up. Hirst was expected but did not appear,

Mortimer turned up for the final round of judging only, leaving Griff

Rhys Jones as the only famous name who carried out his full jury

responsibilities.



Fink defended his move to appoint celebrity judges. He demanded: ‘Who

knows more about good TV scripts than a successful TV comedy writer, and

who better to judge illustration than Damien Hirst?’



This year’s re-organisation of the juries into 18 specialist panels that

sat for two days each, helped to make the workload more manageable

compared with last year, when 36 judges, divided into only three groups,

were asked to sift through 14,000 entries over five days.



Fink claimed the new system was a success, with a 5 per cent drop-out

rate among judges this year, as opposed to nearly 50 per cent last year.



Perspective, p19



Topics

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus