Parliament to take harder line on use of portcullis image

Agencies run the risk of parliamentary punishment if they produce ads that feature reproductions of penny coins.

Agencies run the risk of parliamentary punishment if they produce

ads that feature reproductions of penny coins.



The problem has arisen because the crowned portcullis symbol on the back

of a penny closely resembles the emblem of the House of Commons.



But while the Royal Mint has always had a relaxed view about the use of

coins in ads, asking only that they are not disfigured when reproduced,

Parliament has been taking an increasingly tough stand over unauthorised

use of the portcullis.



Now the Institute of Practitioners in Advertising is asking the Serjeant

at Arms to clarify the rules.



Philip Circus, the IPA’s legal affairs director, said: ’I’d like

reassurance that agencies reproducing the back of pennies don’t find

their senior managers summoned to the bar of the House of Commons

accused of contempt.’



Betty Boothroyd, the Speaker of the House, underlined earlier warnings

about the emblem in a statement this month. She said the Commons’

dignity was at stake and that she reserved the right to give her

personal authorisation for any proposed use.



In theory, the Commons could jail indefinitely anybody found guilty of

contempt. In practice, any agency flouting the rules could expect a

severe ticking off.



’We want to avoid a situation where an agency gets clearance from the

Royal Mint for a proposed design, but finds itself in contempt of

Parliament,’ Circus said.



Topics

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus