Turkey of the Week: NatWest's patronising ad is an ineffective way to connect with women

There's a difference between financial feminism and mansplaining.

NatWest and Stylist: we'll give the roses a miss
NatWest and Stylist: we'll give the roses a miss

Dear Mr Banker, you’re right. Yes, we women need to be spoken to "respectfully" and in a "non-patronising way". And, yes, it’s crucial that we tackle the "financial confidence gap".

But, frankly, we don’t need you to mansplain money to us.

In the ad, you say: "Only powerful meaningful change will make a difference." Yet, from the painstakingly patronising tone to the "I’m sorry" roses, I struggle to see how this spot makes any meaningful change.

We need tangible action from NatWest to promote financial feminism, not an insulting letter.

Brand NatWest
Title A woman’s worth 
Agency NatWest and Stylist

Become a member of Campaign from just £77 a quarter

Get the very latest news and insight from Campaign with unrestricted access to campaignlive.co.uk , plus get exclusive discounts to Campaign events

Become a member

Looking for a new job?

Get the latest creative jobs in advertising, media, marketing and digital delivered directly to your inbox each day.

Create an alert now

Partner content

Never mind purpose, what's your legacy?

'Curiosity is a muscle'